Albuquerque's Environmental Story

Educating For a Sustainable Community

Environmental Topic: Arroyos

by Rex Funk


Background and Problems

Albuquerque is a unique place in many ways. One contributing element is the natural drainage system of arroyos. These arroyos carry runoff from the Sandias and West Mesa to the Rio Grande and are dry most of the year. They flow most heavily in the summer when the warm, moist, tropical air masses from southern California and the Gulf of Mexico collide over the Sandias. Originally these arroyos meandered freely across the land responding to the volume and velocity of storm water runoff, thereby creating large flood plains and alluvial fans.

Natural arroyos are rich in plant life due to the soil moisture that remains after runoff events. Dense growths of chamisa, Apache plume, skunkbush, and even a few cattails line arroyo channels. Herbs and grasses often are quite healthy along these channels also. The abundant vegetation attracts a concentration of native wildlife in search of food and shelter. Herbivores like the jackrabbit, cottontail, rock squirrel, white-tailed antelope, ground squirrel, pocket gopher, flocks of sparrows, towhees, and other birds flock to natural arroyos. Predators like the coyote, badger, hawk, owl, roadrunner, and a variety of snakes and lizards also frequent natural arroyos. Bears, deer, and mountain lions use arroyo channels as migratory routes. With such a diversity of plants and wildlife, it would seem that urban residents would be eager to preserve arroyo flood plains. This, unfortunately, has not been the case. Only a few sections of arroyos have been preserved as natural channels in the Albuquerque metropolitan area.

Natural Arroyo Corridor

A good example of a natural arroyo corridor is the Bear Arroyo north of Montgomery, between Juan Tabo and the Sandia Foothills. Over 150 acres in this area are preserved as natural channel. Hiking trails run through the area, and visitors delight at the wildlife and vegetation. The trails link with foothill and mountain trails of the Sandias. A 1% for art sculpture of a mother bear with two cubs graces a granite boulder at the Bear Arroyo and Tramway.

Although residents discovered the natural and recreational virtues of arroyos late, a 1986 document entitled the Facility Plan for Arroyos has attempted to make up for this oversight. The plan recognizes three classifications of arroyos in the metropolitan area. The first of these is Urban Recreational Links. These are located in highly developed or developing urban areas. They have usually been straightened and concrete lined, but some contain linear park sections. Examples include much of the Embudo and Bear, Hahn, and lower Piedras Marcadas Arroyos. They can accommodate trails and some active recreation.

Open Space Link Arroyos

Concrete-lined Arroyo
 Photo of Concrete-lined Arroyo

The second category is the Open Space Link Arroyos. These channels have the potential to link major Open Space areas such as the Sandia Foothills, Bosque, and West Mesa Open Space. Examples include Piedras Marcadas, South Pino, Amole, Pajarito, and La Cueva Arroyos. Prescribed treatments can include hard lining, rip-rap, or other channel treatments. The third category is Open Space Arroyos. The plan mandates that these arroyos be maintained as natural channels wherever possible. The Callabacillas and portions of the Tijeras Arroyos and parts of some other arroyos fit into this category. The Tijeras is the largest, and the Callabacillas is the second largest arroyo in the metropolitan area. The Tijeras Arroyo, which flows out of Tijeras Canyon south of the Albuquerque International Airport and empties into the Rio Grande south of Rio Bravo, drains over 80 square miles and has a 100-year-storm capacity two-thirds that of the Rio Grande. The Arroyo Facility Plan mandates that Open Space arroyos will be maintained in their natural state with little or no structural improvement. Encroachment into the flood plain and channelization is to be prevented by public acquisition of the natural flood plain through dedication or purchase. The Arroyos Facilities Plan also proposes a network of connecting trails along arroyos so that residents can enjoy off-street walking, cycling, and horseback riding.


Network of Trails Proposed

Implementation of this plan will require public education, advanced planning, coordination, and public expenditure. It is a reversal of years of seeing and using arroyos for only the purpose of carrying storm runoff. Some gains have already been made in trail construction, and preserving sections of arroyos like the Bear and upper San Antonio in natural channels. Recreation trail planning is complete for some arroyos, but funding will be required to implement the plans. Rapid development and accompanying runoff is threatening encroachment on the Calabacillas and Tijeras Open Space Arroyos, and motorized vehicles and trash dumping is degrading these natural areas. Owners of private lands along these arroyos would like to build as close to the channel as possible, and sometimes propose channelizing the arroyo. The Arroyo Facilities Plan is the first balanced attempt to look at multiple use of the arroyo system. With intense development, there will be pressure to ignore the plan in favor of "business as usual." Open Space arroyos need to be consolidated in public ownership and managed under the Open Space system if they are to be preserved. Only strong public advocacy will prevent the loss of these last natural arroyo systems.

Beware the Ditches

Barelas Ditch
 Photo of a Barelas Ditch

Development increases the amount of runoff into channels by increasing the area of impervious surface. With increased urbanization some kind of channel treatment is necessary, not only because the increased runoff causes problems, but because the channels can be hazardous. Given the pattern of brief, but intense, summer storms, there is danger associated with arroyos. A person in one part of an arroyo can be unaware of precipitation at its head, and can be taken by surprise by a debris-laden wave. Just a few inches of fast-moving water in a channel can cause a person to lose footing. The safest time to venture into an arroyo is when the skies are cloudless and blue, but it is important to remember that good weather is never a guarantee of safety, as many banks are weakened by erosion and tend to crumble.

Ways to Treat Arroyos

There are many different ways of treating arroyos to reduce hazards and allow development. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on economics and adjacent land uses. Density of development, amount of impervious surface, and the character of development are three elements of adjacent land use that must be understood before selecting an arroyo treatment. These elements are intertwined, but analyzing each separately makes it possible to arrive at the best possible solution. For example, an area with large impervious surface, high density, and a population usually present only from 9 to 5 may be best suited to a concrete-lined channel. On the other hand, a residential area with low density and a small area of impervious surface might be best handled by an open space plan.

Traditionally, engineers have used concrete channels to move storm water runoff through the drainage system as efficiently and quickly as possible. But environmentalists have wanted to slow the water and treat arroyos as an amenity and resource. These citizens favor allowing infiltration and nurturing of native plants, thereby creating open space parks along the sides of the natural arroyos. By analyzing adjacent development and considering the entire length of the arroyo as a system, the ideas of both engineers and environmentalists can be realized.

Analyze Arroyo and Choose Proper Method

Albuquerque currently treats arroyos in seven different ways, depending on times and places in which each treatment may be appropriate. Analyzing characteristics is difficult, but must be done to arrive at the appropriate treatment.

  1. Grading is a low-cost and simple method, but the banks tend to be unstable, requiring frequent maintenance. Often when a channel is graded, it is also straightened, allowing the water to move faster than in a naturally meandering arroyo. Water in straightened channels also meanders naturally in an attempt to stabilize itself, thus eroding the sides of the channel. The erosion may result in the cave-in of the channel sides, and frequent maintenance is important.
  2. Rip-rap is used quite often in graded channels at specific points vulnerable to erosion. Rip-rap is chunks of rocks or concrete which, when held in place by wire mesh, is referred to as gabions. Both rip-rap and gabions work best when vegetation is encouraged. Plants hold the soil in place and prevent erosion around the rocks and wire mesh.
  3. Another channel treatment involves the use of paving blocks on side slopes with natural vegetation growing between. This method stabilizes the slope and has open space characteristics, but needs irrigation to start vegetation growth and maintenance after high flows. The blocks can also be used with grass, and would then require the same maintenance as many Albuquerque parks.
  4. Drop structures are used to stabilize the channels and slow the flow of water. The structures are like terraces or steps, and are intended to slow water velocity by creating "waterfalls." The main problem with this method occurs when falling water carves away the ground at the foot of the structure, either creating pools, or undermining the foundation. Because of these inherent problems, drop structures require frequent maintenance.
  5. Low-flow concrete channels with grass side slopes are often used in parks. The channels accommodate storm water runoff within the concrete portion and have some overflow onto the grass. The grass side slopes are easily integrated with landscaping to harmonize with the park's facilities. This type of treatment incurs costs for irrigation and maintenance of the side slopes and landscape.
  6. Concrete lining is the most predictable in terms of engineering design but, other than storm sewers, involves the greatest change to the natural system. The channel is straightened, its width decreased, and it is lined with the impervious surface of concrete. A combination of these three elements increases the velocity of water. Because the water moves much more quickly through these channels, the hazard to people or animals in a concrete arroyo when a storm occurs is greatly increased. Although straightening and narrowing creates a hazard, it does leave more land open for development.
Paseo del Nordeste
 Photo of a concrete lined channel

Some other problems of concrete lined channels involve erosion and sediment. In many places the channels do bend or are narrowed, as, for example, in culverts under roads. This causes water velocity to decrease. As the flow slows, particles drop from the water and produce sediment build up which can clog the system. Concrete channels need maintenance to remove this sediment. Erosion becomes a problem when an upstream section of the arroyo is concrete lined and it meets a downstream, unlined section. The increased velocity of the water flowing from the lined channel immediately erodes the unlined section. Conversely, an unlined section upstream can bring sedimentation into a lined section. When selecting a treatment for a section of arroyo channel, it is important to be aware of what is occurring both upstream and downstream.

Storm sewers that replace arroyos with an underground pipe system entirely alter the landscape. However, storm sewers allow the freedom from planning for an on-site arroyo, and the initial construction cost can be outweighed by the value of land gained. Although land can be saved, the maintenance cost of this closed system can be high.

During heavy flows, the water can back up and have nowhere to go. The system does leave land free for development, but its use would take away an element that makes Albuquerque unique.


Options and Opinions

Discussion Questions

  1. Since arroyos are considered hazardous, should we encourage adjacent trails and parks? What can be done to make both parks and arroyo channels safer?
  2. If we want semi-natural channels, which use more right-of-way, who should pay for it? Entire city? Specific development areas? Developers?
  3. How can privacy be provided for those who live near trails and parks?
  4. Why does trash dumping into arroyo channels occur? What can be done to prevent it?
  5. What possible solutions, such as cluster development, can occur, and what would be the repercussions of on-site detention (of water)? How would these solutions affect life style?

Possible Solutions/Opinions

  1. Concrete-lined, open drainage systems are so hazardous, the entire system should just be put underground to leave the land safe and open for development.
  2. Water is a precious commodity in the Southwest. We should use storm run-off for irrigation and landscaping. Channels should be designed to allow for infiltration.
  3. Concrete channels are ugly and hazardous, while soft lining solutions are aesthetic and less dangerous. If Albuquerque wants the arroyos to be multiple-use areas, arroyos should be soft lined.
  4. Recent studies have shown that infiltration in natural arroyos does not occur to the extent necessary to recharge the aquifer, so why design channels for infiltration?
  5. If site planning for adjacent development were designed for on-site detention and infiltration, there could be intense density with natural or semi-natural channels.

Activities

  1. Build a "mountain" of soil in a deep tub. Let water flow down one part of it rapidly, and note how an arroyo is formed. Set up several such arroyos, and experiment with different surfaces along the sides (cement, bird seed grass, pebbles and rocks). How fast does water flow down each of these arroyos? How fast does the sediment flow? Collect the water which reaches the bottom. Is there a difference in the amount? Can students think of other types of channel treatment?
  2. If possible, visit one or several arroyos. Note the treatment used to prevent erosion. Look for damage, advantages of the method(s) used, general appearance of the arroyo, etc. Discuss students' opinions concerning the advantages and disadvantages of various arroyo treatment methods.
  3. Have students find out the definitions of some terms used in connection with floods (flood plain, 100 year flood, standard project flood). For further information about flooding, have students contact AMAFCA (Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority). When was the last 100 year flood in Albuquerque? Have floods been increasing or decreasing in severity? Why?
  4. See the Environmental Topic, "Safety," for suggested activities related to arroyos and safety.

(Up to Section V, Back to Architectural Review, On to Art in Public Places)

Copyright © 2008, Friends of Albuquerque's Environmental Story